<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>jamesloganmd.com</title>
      <link>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/</link>
      <description>Self distractions of a former OBGYN resident</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:06:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.12</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Upgrayedd!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I finally made the plunge and upgraded to movable type version 4.1.  I realize the change makes no difference to you.  I can only hope it will make a difference to me.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/06/#000049</link>
         <guid>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/06/#000049</guid>
         <category>Blogging</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:06:54 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Escribitionism</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I just discovered an awesome website for any blogger who is trying to increase his site traffic.  I currently get about three or four visitors per day.  And, while I thank those loyal three or four readers for their interest, I can't help but feel jameslogan.md is underachieving.  The site I'm talking about is <a href="http://www.problogger.net/" target="_blank">problogger.net</a>.  They have some excellent tips for finding new readers and publicizing your blog.  </p>

<p>Which brings me to my second point: why do we care so much whether or not any reads our blog anyway?  For those select few who attract thousands of visitors per day and for whom blogging is a real business, the answer is obvious.  Their revenue is directly tied to their readership.  But, for the vast majority of us, blogging is only a hobby destined to earn us $0 over the course of our blog's lifetime.  So, why do we care whether or not anyone reads us?  Are we hoping to become famous?  Are we hoping to gain power and influence?  Are we clinging to some subconscoius notion that, if only people knew what we had to say then everyone else would see the light and agree with us and there'd be no more war, no more poverty?  For me, I think the combination of all these things comprises about 15% my motivation.  The other 85% is comprised roughly equal parts vanity and exhibitionism.</p>

<p>Why do you blog?</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/06/#000048</link>
         <guid>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/06/#000048</guid>
         <category>Blogging</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:18:09 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>U Penn Outside Hospital</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I'm officially an intern now...<i>again</i>.  Keep those transfers to a minimum, Outside Hospital!</p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xskFo75Wdhs&hl=en&rel=0"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xskFo75Wdhs&hl=en&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/06/#000047</link>
         <guid>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/06/#000047</guid>
         <category>Medical</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:39:04 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Obama&apos;s VP</title>
         <description><![CDATA[In addition to Caroline Kennedy, who is the daughter of the late President John F. Kennedy, former Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder and longtime Washington insider Jim Johnson, I - James Logan, M.D. - have been chosen to assist in the search for a running mate for Barack Obama.  Here are a few names we've been kicking around.
<br><br>
<table border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0">
<tr><td colspan="3" align="left"><h3>After a long and contentionus fight, Barack Obama is the presumptive Democratic nominee.  But who will be his running mate?</h3>
</td></tr>

<tr>
       <td>&nbsp;</td>
       <td align="center"><b><u>PROS</u></b></td>
       <td align="center"><b><u>CONS</u></b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
       <td align="center"><img src="http://www.jamesloganmd.com/images/candidates/h_clinton.jpg" width="133" height="89" alt="Hillary Clinton" border="0"><br>Hillary Clinton</td>
       <td>
	   <ul>
	   <li>Has excellent policy credentials - supports universal healthcare.</li>
	   <li>May help sway a large number of democratic voters who said they would not support Obama if he beat out Clinton as the nominee.</iL
	   </ul>
	   </td>
       <td>
	   <ul>
	   <li>Her high percieved negatives make her a divisive figure which is at odds with Obama's message of unity and hope.</li>  
	   <li>With Bill back in the Whitehouse, high potential for shennigans that will distract from the issues.</li>
	   <li>Won't make racist, blue-collar white voters from Kentucky any less racist.</li>
	   <li>Would be second in line to the presidency</li>
	   </ul>
	   </td>
</tr>
<tr><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
<tr>
       <td align="center"><img src="http://www.jamesloganmd.com/images/candidates/j_lieberman.jpg" width="94" height="114" alt="Joe Lieberman" border="0"><br>Joe Lieberman</td>
       <td>
	   <ul>
	   <li>Would help to quiet fears that Obama is a closet Muslim who wants to destroy Isreal.</li>	   
	   </ul>
	   </td>
       <td>
	   <ul>
	   <li>Unacceptably high liklihood that he would take the nomination as a Republican double-agent, bent on destroying the democratic party.</li>
	   </ul>
	   </td>
</tr>
<tr><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
<tr>
       <td align="center"><img src="http://www.jamesloganmd.com/images/candidates/w_clark.jpg" width="109" height="150" alt="Wesley Clark" border="0"><br>Wesley Clark</td>
       <td>
	   <ul>
	   <li>Outstanding military service record</li>
	   <li>Outstanding military service record</li>
	   <li>Looks great in a suit.</li>
	   </ul>
	   </td>
       <td>
	   <ul>
	   <li>Could be taken down easily in a barfight.</li>
	   </ul>
	   </td>
</tr>
<tr><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
<tr>
       <td align="center"><a href="http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/05/#000038"><img src="http://www.jamesloganmd.com/images/candidates/drpacman_sm.png" width="110" height="138" alt="Dr. Pacman" border="0"></a><br>
	   <a href="http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/05/#000038">Dr. Pacman</a></td>
       <td>
	   <ul>
	   <li>Can adapt well to an ever changing political landscape.</li>
	   <li>Expected to help Obama carry 95% of the Donkey Kong supporters.</li>
	   </td>
       <td>
	   <ul>
	   <li>Economic stimulus plan has been criticized for "lacking depth."</li>
	   <li>Colored ghosts have not registerd with the general public as a significant national security threat since 1968.</li> 
	   </td>
</tr>
</table>
<br><br>
I promise to keep my readers updated on the process, as more candidates are vetted.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/06/#000046</link>
         <guid>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/06/#000046</guid>
         <category>Politics/Current Events</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 01:14:00 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Bridge over troubled water</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>My girlfriend and I watched the movie <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0454921/" target="_blank"><i>The Pursuit of Happiness</i></a> tonight.  Grossly overrated movie but it does include a really nice version of Simon and Garfunkel's song, "Bridge Over Troubled Water" sung by Roberta Flack from her 1971 album <i>Quiet Fire</i>.  Here's YouTube clip from one of Simon and Garfunkel's live performances:<br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sbFEnoITiWE&hl=en&rel=0"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sbFEnoITiWE&hl=en&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
I really love that song.  I would kill to be able to sing it the way Art Garfunkel does.  I really would.  Most of the time, when people say they would kill for something, it's just a euphemism, "I'd kill for a doughnut right now, I could just kill someone, you kill me...etc"  But I really mean it.  I would actually commit cold blooded murder in order to be able to sing like that.  I mean, I wouldn't kill my sister or my parents.  In fact, there's a pretty long list of people whom I would <i>not</i> kill no matter what I would get in return.  But the guy who gave me a parking ticket last week, the woman at the DMV who wouldn't give me my plates, <a href="http://www.anncoulter.com/" target="_blank">Anne Coulter</a>...  I would truly consider killing one or more of these people in order to be able to hit some of those high notes in a song like "Bridge Over Troubled Water."  <br />
What a great song ;-)</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/06/#000045</link>
         <guid>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/06/#000045</guid>
         <category>Uncategorizable</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 01:57:37 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>The pipe</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>If you go to my <a href="http://www.jamesloganmd.com/links.html">links</a> page, you'll see that I've created an aggregation of some medical blogs I read using <a href="http://pipes.yahoo.com" target="_blank">yahoo pipes</a>.  The pipe displays the combined most recent 25 entries from the 30 or so sites that I've aggregated so far.  This, like everything on this site, is a work in progress.  What I'd like to do is establish a semi-official, comprehensive MedBlogs pipe.  If you see one of your posts listed, then I've already included your blog in the pipe.  If you don't see one of your posts in the pipe and you'd like to be added, <a href="http://www.jamesloganmd.com/contact.html">contact me</a> with your blog url and I'll add you.  Please spread the word on your own site too!</p>

<p>Learn more about pipes <a href="http://blog.pipes.yahoo.net/about-pipes/" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/06/#000044</link>
         <guid>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/06/#000044</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 00:46:42 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>My trip to the DMV</title>
         <description><![CDATA[One of the first orders of business one needs to take care of when moving to California is to get a California driver's license and California plates.  I had reserved a full day for this endeavor, anticipating that it would take at least the entire morning to achieve complete Californization of my vehicle and of all my vehicular activities.  If I were to fail within that time span, surely I would succeed by mid to late afternoon.  In preparation, I had scoured boxes upon unpacked boxes in my apartment, gathering every document that I felt had even the slightest chance of proving remotely relevant to my quest. <br>
<br>
Brimming with confidence, I boldly rolled my file cabinet's worth of documentation up to the reception desk.  I was about to feed the bureaucratic process a can of <i>whoopass</i>.  Fists on hips and face to the sky, my hair blowing wildly, I summoned my deepest, most heroic sounding voice and announced, "I am here to obtain a California license and registration."  With a bored expression, the clerk reached up and turned off the fan which had just kicked on unexpectedly.  My hair was no longer blowing, but I still <i>felt</i> pretty heroic.<br>
"Do you have your birth certificate?" Though delivered by an actual white-haired lady behind the counter, the words could have just as easily been delivered by an automated phone menu.
"I've got it right here!" I jerked open the top file drawer, yanked out a manila folder and, with a toothy smile, I casually tossed it on the desk before her.<br>
"Passport?"<br>
"Never leave home without it," I patted my breast pocket.<br>
"Proof of insurance?"<br>
"I'm in good hands!"  I pulled an Allstate insurance card out of my wallet.<br>
<br>
Now, I could see the wheels turning.  Apparently considering me a worthy opponent, the clerk's lips curled into a smile.  "Do you have your original car title, the car's current mileage, original mileage at time of purchase, date of original purchase, amount paid at time of original purchase, notarized proof of sale, amount paid in taxes at the time of original purchase and a listing of government programs those tax dollars went towards sponsoring?"  I pulled out the requisite documents and sorted them neatly in front of her.  Feigning indifference, she pressed on.  "What is your gender?"<br>
"Male."<br>
"Race?"<br>
"White."<br>
"Ever been convicted of a felony?"<br>
"No."<br>
"When's the last time you donated blood?"<br>
"May 12, 2002."<br>
"Favorite color?"<br>
"Purple."  She almost caught me with this one; I had almost said, 'black.'  But, I got it at the last second.<br>
"Alright," she now began typing - or pretending to type, I couldn't be sure - some of this information into her computer.  "I'll just need a copy of your previous, out of state license, a record of your most recent grade point average, and proof of what you ate for breakfast this morning."  I calmly laid out my Illinois license, a copy of my medical school transcript and a half-eaten doughnut.<br>
<br>
A feeling of pride began to well up inside me.  The end was in sight!  All that remained would be a battery physical and mental challenges most likely including an eye test, written test, driving test, photograph, vehicle inspection, the feat of strength, some signatures and fees - a long, drawn out hassle to be sure, but a clear path to victory!  But the clerk would have one final trick up her sleeve - something I had not anticipated.  Her eyes narrowed, her steely expression unwavering. Has your car been <i>smogged</i>?"<br>
I gulped.  "Smogged?"  I repeated dumbly, trying to imagine what the verb 'to smog' might refer to and hoping desperately that it was something that I had done at some point.<br>
Smelling blood, she pressed on.  "Yes, smogged.  How do you expect me to certify your CS-39 authorization unless your car has been smogged."<br>
I was now a helpless rabbit, dangling in her vice-like grip and I saw no signal to indicate that she had any intention of relenting.  My confidence utterly deflated, I had only one play left to make.  "Has my vehicle been smogged...um, I had the emissions tested in Illinois?"<br>
This was all she needed  The day was hers.  "Oh, I'm sorry," a rivulet of sarcasm dripped from her mouth, leaving a small puddle on the floor.  "You'll have to have your vehicle smogged in California before we can give you a California registration.  Please come back when you've gotten that taken care of.  NEXT!"<br>
<br>
Defeated, I began to put away the mountain of paper that had accumulated.  I hung my head and trudged for the exit, pushing my filing cabinet in front of me like a homeless person with their shopping cart. <br>
<br>
Well played, California DMV.  This round goes to you.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/06/#000042</link>
         <guid>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/06/#000042</guid>
         <category>Daily goings-on</category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 01:35:47 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Road trip</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The sum total of all my worldly possessions are now either a) in my car, b) <i>are</i> my car, c) in the custody of the U.S. postal service, or d) on my person.  Tomorrow morning, my father and I are taking the mother of all road trips - Chicago to Sacramento in 4 days!  To prepare, I have assembled the following listening material for the many hours of driving:<br />
<ol><br />
<li>Barack Obama, <i>The Audacity of Hope</i></li><br />
<li>Steve Martin, <i>Pure Drivel</i></li><br />
<li>The Twilight Zone, <i>Selected Radio Dramas</i></li><br />
<li>David Sedaris, <i>When You are Engulfed in Flames</i></li><br />
<li>Arianna Huffington, <i>Right is Wrong</i></li><br />
</ol><br />
And, if any time remains, I have some audio books borrowed from my parents including:<br />
<ul><br />
<li>Thomas Cathcart & Daniel Klein, <i>Aristotle and an Aardvark go to Washington</i></li><br />
<li>Great Classic Stories by authors including:<br />
<ul><br />
<li>Oscar Wilde</li><br />
<li>Edgar Allen Poe</li><br />
<li>Guy de Maupassant</i><br />
<li>F. Scott Fitzgerald</i><br />
</ul><br />
<li>C.S. Lewis <i>The Screwtape Letters</i></li><br />
<li>Monty Python's Flying Circus, <i>Greatest Hits</i><br />
</ul><br />
I should be back to blogging around the middle of next week.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/06/#000041</link>
         <guid>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/06/#000041</guid>
         <category>Daily goings-on</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 22:52:11 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Grand rounds</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>A new <a href="http://thehappyhospitalist.blogspot.com/2008/05/grand-rounds-is-here-turn-off-your-dang_25.html" target="_blank">Grand Rounds</a> is up at <a href="http://thehappyhospitalist.blogspot.com" target="_blank">The Happy Hospitalist</a>.  Read entertaining post from all around the healthcare blogosphere!</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/06/#000040</link>
         <guid>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/06/#000040</guid>
         <category>Medical</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 10:57:03 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Recount</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Remember that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treehouse_of_Horror_VII" target="_blank"><i>Simpsons</i></a> Halloween special where Kang and Kodos try to take over the Earth by posing as Bob Dole and Bill Clinton during the 1996 election?  In yet another demonstration of how <i>The Simpsons</i> was ahead of it's time, Kodos/Bob Dole has the following line, "I hope we achieve a fair result in the election, eliminating the need for a violent bloodbath."</p>

<p>The movie <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1000771/" target="_blank"><i>Recount</i></a>, which premiered on HBO on May 25, portrays the events surrounding the contested results of Florida's vote in the 2000 election.  Though it tends to give me atrial flutter whenever I revisit those events, I very much enjoyed the movie.  Kevin Spacey stars as Ron Klain, Gore's former chief of staff, who was largely in charge of the legal effort to get the votes in Florida recounted.  On May 9, Charlie Rose talked to Kevin Spacey about his role.  Although Spacey went on record as disagreeing with this assertion, the film is clearly biased in favor of those who would have liked to see the Florida recount proceed.  It would be pretty poor storytelling to portray it any other way.  However, there is a speech by James Baker's character towards the end (played by Tom Wilkinson) that I liked very much.  His point is that, whatever you can say about the 2000 election, we followed a proper, legal process.  The tension that our country experienced could have easily escalated to the level of a national crisis, perhaps even civil war.  But the legal process was followed, the various Florida courts as well as the Supreme Court made their respective rulings and those rulings were respected.  There were no tanks in the streets, no riots, no armed insurgency.  </p>

<p>So, for those of you - like me - for whom the past eight years have been a perpetual nightmare, I recommend this movie.  If you compare ourselves to countries like Kenya or Zimbabwe, who couldn't make a peaceful transition of power if their lives depended on it, this movie may restore some of your faith in our democracy.</p>

<p>Charlie's interview with Kevin Spacey can be seen here:<br />
<embed style="width:400px; height:326px;" id="VideoPlayback" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=2080188749697348193:159000:1494000&hl=en" flashvars=""> </embed></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/06/#000039</link>
         <guid>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/06/#000039</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:47:28 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Dr. PacMan</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.jamesloganmd.com/images/drpacman.PNG" border="0" align="right" width="135" height="172">I've temporarily put up a <a href="http://gmodules.com/ig/ifr?url=http://www.schulz.dk/pacman.xml&up_LANG=en&synd=open&w=320&h=420&title=PacMan+v2.6&lang=all&country=ALL&border=%23ffffff%7C3px%2C1px+solid+%23999999&source=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jamesloganmd.com%2Flinks.html#">PacMan</a> gadget up on my '<a href="http://www.jamesloganmd.com/links.html">Links</a>' page.  PacMan is a little before my time; I grew up in the 8-bit graphics era of <i>Nintendo</i>.  Also popular around this time were: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slap_bracelet" target="_blank">slap bracelets</a>, <a href="http://www.ninjaturtles.com/" target="_blank">Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles</a> and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxN_pbMOFk0" target="_blank">Vanilla Ice</a>.  
<br><br>
I encourage you to play and to relive your childhood as I have been doing for the past 17 hours, or so.  Whether I am having a true insight, or whether it is the onset of video game-induced delirium, I find myself seeing many parallels between the plight of our PacMan hero and the plight of the primary care physician.  Thus, I have compiled the following top 10 list:<br>
<ol id="reverse_numbering"><h3>Top Ten reasons why PacMan would make an excellent physician:</h3>
<li>Hunger - PacMan is <i>hungry</i>.  Likewise, the excellent physician should never lose his hunger for knowledge.</i>
<li>Confidence - A physician can cause harm to his patient by second guessing himself.  Sometimes, suboptimal management given in a timely manner can be better than optimal management given after a delay or hesitancy.  PacMan has to be sure of his ability to eat all the dots.  If he goes for all the power pellets right away, not sure of his ability to effectively evade the ghosts, he will be in trouble later on when all the power pellets are gone.</li>
<li>Risk vs. benefit - PacMan is the foremost authority on risk-benefit analysis.  Each ghost he eats is worth more than the previous one.  If he eats just one ghost that's 200 pts., but if he eats all four that's 3000 pts!  However, each additional ghost he eats confers an added risk of getting killed or of not being able to eat all the dots.  PacMan must carefully balance all of these opposing factors.</li>
<li>Self direction - PacMan must guide himself through a tricky maze.  Staying in one place for too long spells certain death for PacMan as it does for the physician who is not self-directed and self-motivated in his continuing education.</li>
<li>Yellow - PacMan is bright and colorful and would nicely complement the decor in a pediatrician's office.</i>
<li>Flexibility and adaptability - PacMan, if he had them, would be constantly required to think on his feet.  Just as the same management protocol is not appropriate for every patient, PacMan cannot eat all the dots and navigate the maze in the same way every time.  He has to be constantly changing his plan of attack in order to avoid the ghosts.</i>
<li>Expediency - PacMan is always in a hurry!  And, given today's culture of managed care and the 15 minute office visit, PacMan knows how to eat all those dots in the most efficient manner possible.</i>
<li>Two-dimensional - Ok, maybe this isn't really an advantage per se.  But, hey, at least he's not <i>one</i> dimensional!</i>
<li>Anticipatory - PacMan must always anticipate where the ghosts might go in order to avoid them.  And he must have a plan in place in case they go somewhere other than where he expects them to go.</i>
<li>Round - PacMan is circular, like the excellent, well-rounded physician who has ideas and interests and partakes of activities outside the medical world.</i>
</ol>
<script type="text/javascript">
var reverse=document.getElementById('reverse_numbering');
reverse.style.listStyle='none';
var li=reverse.getElementsByTagName('li');
for(var i=0; i<li.length; i++)
{
    li[i].insertBefore(document.createTextNode(li.length-i+'. '), li[i].firstChild);
}
</script>
If you don't believe me, play the game for yourself!]]></description>
         <link>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/05/#000038</link>
         <guid>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/05/#000038</guid>
         <category>Movies/Entertainment</category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 00:48:26 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Prince Caspian: a political agenda?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I'm back home for a few days and went with my family to see the most recent in the film adaptation of C.S. Lewis's "The Chronicles of Narnia," <i>Prince Caspian</i>.  It's been a very long time since I read the book, so I can't really speak as to how faithful the movie is.  The plot involves our heroes, Peter, Susan, Edmund and Lucy, getting called back to Narnia by Prince Caspian (the rightful heir to the Telmarine throne) in order to defeat his evil uncle, Miraz, who intends to have Prince Caspian murdered and to usurp the throne for himself.</p>

<p>The action is passably good, if rather tame.  Like good Christians, the Pevensey children, along with Prince Caspian, turn the other cheek, do unto their enemies as they would have done unto them and work out a diplomatic solution to the "succession to the throne" issue involving a power-sharing agreement between Caspian and Miraz that...  Oh, no wait a second - nope none of that actually happened.  What actually happens is that, like good Christians, Caspian and the Pevensey children preemptively attack their enemies and bravely slaughter them in battle.  In fact, given that the mortality rate in this movie rivals <i>The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers</i> it was quite a feat for the producers to come away with a PG rating.  </p>

<p>Another interesting decision on the part of the producers of this movie was to give Caspian and the Telmarines Spanish accents.  The back story here is that the Telmarines are descended from pirates and, many centuries ago, accidentally came upon some kind of wormhole that brought them to Narnia.  Then, instead of behaving like good houseguests, they proceeded to rape and pillage everything in sight.  The Telmarines are eventually undone while pursuing our heroes across a river which Aslan (the God figure) then causes to rise up and swallow them.  The evil Miraz now defeated, Aslan then goes on to make an offer to the Telmarines, "You may live with us in peace or, more preferably, you may walk through this door I have made in the air and end up some place...else.  Someplace where we will never have to see you again."  Hmmmm, sound at all familiar?  Large numbers of hispanic looking and sounding people, trying to cross a river into unwelcome territory and subsequently being <i>deported</i> to another realm?  Does <i>The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian</i> have a political agenda?  I'll let you decide.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/05/#000037</link>
         <guid>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/05/#000037</guid>
         <category>Movies/Entertainment</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 22:30:55 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Crazy pregnant patients</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I'm studying for Step III using USMLE world and I get the following question:<blockquote><br />
22 year old pregnant female in her second trimester is brought to the emergency room by her boyfriend because she's threatening to commit suicide.  On initial evaluation, she exhibits clear, unmistakable signs of a manic episode and a clear intent to kill herself.  What is the appropriate management?  (I'm paraphrasing to respect USMLE World copywright)<br />
A. hospitalize and give prozac<br />
B. ask to speak to the boyfriend privately and find out what he did to make her so crazy<br />
C. grab her by the shoulders, shake vigorously and tell her to calm down already<br />
D. hospitalize and give ECT (electroconvulsive therapy)<br />
E. reassurance and discharge home</blockquote><br />
In real life, when this lady shows up to OB triage, the correct answer is: consult and let them deal with it - she has no OB issue.  Unfortunately, the USMLE examiners operate under the assumption that the only doctor available is YOU.  The scary thing about this question, however, is that one of the above answers is <i>not</i> made up.  Think you know which one?  </p>

<p>The the not-made-up, and apparently correct, answer is D - electroconvulsive (shock) therapy.  Yeah, I have some misgivings about that answer.  As an OB resident, we used to work very hard and even give potentially toxic medications to pregnant women in order to <i>prevent</i> seizures.  It seems pretty counterintuitive to me that you'd want to <i>induce</i> a seizure in a pregnant woman.  I understand that there's lots of literature on ECT.  Proponents will cite its superb effectiveness.  And, I have no argument there.  ECT is very effective treatment.  But, I always thought that "effective" kind of misses the point when your talking about ECT.  I mean, a foot amputation is a pretty "effective" treatment for toenail fungus but, Jesus Christ, man - you're causing a seizure!  I mean seizure - like on those medical shows when the camera starts moving around all fast, and the patient is foaming at the mouth and monitors are going off and everyone's yelling at each other; you're creating this situation <i>intentionally</i>.   </p>

<p>Anyway, study time is over.  I'm going to bed. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/05/#000036</link>
         <guid>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/05/#000036</guid>
         <category>Medical</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 02:20:27 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Are bloggers journalists?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.marketingservicestalk.com/news/dla/dla100.html" target="_blank">Marketingservicestalk</a> blog recently published some statistics on how bloggers perceive themselves with respect to the news media.  According to a report from a legal services organization called DLA Piper, "Only 5 per cent of internet users are clear on their legal rights and responsibilities when posting comment online."  Their research also showed that, while 42 per cent of internet users believe that bloggers should be held to the same standards as journalists, only 27 per cent of actual bloggers agreed.  </p>

<p>I'm not particularly hung up on whether or not bloggers are journalists - logging into their free account a few times a week in order to commit random acts of journalism.  Certainly, very few of them are <i>good</i> journalists.  And virtually none of them are engaged in anything remotely resembling real, investigative reporting - something that is slowing going the way of the dodo in today's media markets.  </p>

<p>I do truly applaud the men and women on the ground with real jobs, earning real salaries, with real professional standards, who keep me informed about what's actually going on in the world.  However, I am not one of them.   We at jamesloganmd.com are <i>not</i> journalists.  We do not report news, nor do we hold ourselves to any standards whatsoever.  Anything you read here has equal chances of being either real or fictional, truth or falsehood, fact or opinion.  The author of what you read here may be James Logan, M.D., or it may be someone else. Or it may be no one at all!  We cannot verify any facts or claims made or not made herein; neither can we verify the existence of jamesloganmd.com nor its readers. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/05/#000035</link>
         <guid>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/05/#000035</guid>
         <category>Politics/Current Events</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 17:56:37 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Kennedy brain tumor</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.jamesloganmd.com/images/obama_kennedy.jpg" align="left" hspace="5" alt="Ted Kennedy endorses Obama for president">During my workout today, I listened to Sanjay Gupta talk to Wolf Blitzer about Ted Kennedy's newly found brain tumor for a good seven or eight minutes without ever learning what the actual diagnosis was - other than "malignant brain tumor."  <a href="http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/health/jan-june08/tumor_05-20.html" target="_blank"><i>The News HourWith Jim Lehrer</i></a> rarely lets me down and somebody had apparently informed the UCSF neuro-oncologist they interviewed, Susan Chang, of the diagnosis - <i>malignant glioma</i>.  Everyone seems to be dancing around the prognosis; suffice it to say, the prognosis is poor.  According to my own bit of cursory research, 80% of people in senator Kennedy's age bracket can expect to be dead in about a year with almost none surviving past 3 years.  On a tangential note, I was very impressed to see that, at the time of the writing of this article, someone had already updated Ted Kennedy's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_kennedy" target="_blank">wikipedia entry</a> to reflect the diagnosis which was only made public earlier today.</p>

<p>The point that I want to get at - and, I realize this is going to sound callous - is that I think that this is one of the best things that could have happened to Obama's campaign.  Kennedy is one of Obama's most prominent supporters.  And when someone that close to you, with that degree of popularity, has been diagnosed with a fatal illness...it's <i>gold</i>!  Even McCain was chocked up today:<br />
<blockquote><br />
"I have described Ted Kennedy as the last lion in the Senate," a tearful McCain said on his campaign bus in Florida. "And I have held that view because he remains the single most effective member of the Senate." <br />
</blockquote><br />
Remember when Elizabeth Edwards was diagnosed with a recurrence of breast cancer back in March 2007?  Unfortunately, breast cancer is just way too curable and any momentum that this may have provided the Edwards campaign had pretty much fizzled by primary season.  But, what if it had been ovarian cancer?  And what if she had died in January 2008?  Edwards would have been UNSTOPABLE!  There would have been such an outpouring of sympathy and support for this brave man who carries on despite this terrible tragedy; he would've rolled right into the democratic nomination.  If Ted Kennedy (heaven forbid) doesn't make it to November 4th, it will unite the Democratic Party behind Obama like nothing else.  How could one not pay tribute to one of the most influential senators who ever lived by voting for the candidate whom he had endorsed?  </p>

<p>Therefore, any concievable path to victory for John McCain includes the following two things that must necessarily happen before the election 1) Kennedy must stay alive, 2) they need to find Bin Laden. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/05/#000034</link>
         <guid>http://www.jamesloganmd.com/2008/05/#000034</guid>
         <category>Politics/Current Events</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 00:33:12 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
